![]() ![]() Since it been a dozen years or more since then, I would think it set a base standard for others to follow, but this program seems like a personal tool used by the developers, and it is merely a prettied up script that they probably ran all the time manually, so they automated it. Yes, some of my comment here is duplicate or summary, but overnight I'd been thinking about why this program seemed so wrong, and then I remembered how interactive the original Quarterdeck Clean Sweep was - it used an internal database engine and really analyzed and kept track of what it was offering to do and offered controls and undo. Plus, we can't resize windows, there is no standard menu, no warning before proceeding as to what it will do at each click, no and sequence of steps to help us get familiar with alternatives within the program (if there are any), and it crashes with memory errors and self-exits on my WinXPProSP3 system. This program is essentially a dumb scripting engine that barges ahead through your computer with it's pre-assigned list of tasks regardless of whether or not each individual step is good or bad. Such a "smart" system would also offer an undo, which this program does not offer. ![]() ![]() Such a pre-scan report with interactive toggles would allow you to review and turn on or off any of it's finding before taking action. Unlike the original Quarterdeck Clean Sweep and many the other sophisticated and intelligent registry cleaners that followed, this program does not utilize and build an internal database to first build an analysis of your system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |